runners forum
Go Back
 
Reload this Page The thread killer
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Other
Password
Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #21  
Old 2nd May 08, 01:18 PM
almost_no_specifics's Avatar
almost_no_specifics almost_no_specifics is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sheffield, UK
Age: 21
Posts: 606
Send a message via MSN to almost_no_specifics
Yeah course it was - I wouldn't exactly recommend it to anyone who's not from Sheffield really, but I haven't been in any other halfs, so I can't compare, I'll let you know in June after the Malvern one.
__________________
Mr Octopus has taken over, and you will all bow down his awesome power of massage-magic. Bow little ones... Bow.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 2nd May 08, 01:20 PM
Steve's Avatar
Steve Steve is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Lowestoft.
Age: 44
Posts: 6,157
212 Training Blog Entries
19.00 miles this week
586.79 miles this year
Well most are cheaper for a start!

Right I'd better get down the alottment...
__________________
I need a break!
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 2nd May 08, 10:07 PM
pedestrian's Avatar
pedestrian pedestrian is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: North-East
Age: 44
Posts: 3,024
118 Training Blog Entries
62.30 miles this week
642.13 miles this year
I think that forums should be viewed in the same way as actual groups of people talking down the pub (for want of a better example). Don't all conversations go off at tangents and get side-tracked?
This forum would risk becoming sterile if there were to be introduced a strict "Stick-To-Subject" rule for every thread; and I think that many people would feel excluded and intimidated by such a ruling. The informality and (mainly) light-hearted nature which courses through this forum, make it the friendly place that most people seem to think it is.
Anyone who feels aggrieved by hi-jacked threads is, to be honest, just taking things a little too seriously. It's only a game after all.
__________________
ONLY THOSE WHO WILL RISK GOING TOO FAR CAN POSSIBLY FIND OUT HOW FAR THEY CAN GO.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 3rd May 08, 12:46 AM
cuprasi's Avatar
cuprasi cuprasi is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Leeds
Age: 36
Posts: 42
There is also a place for off topic chat and its not on a thread where someone has asked a question hence you have off topic chat on forums ...

Are you the type pf person down the pub that would randombly change the subject every 2 mins? :eek:
__________________
Simon
Currently at Leeds Met Carnegie
Year 1 of a BSc Sport :eek:
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 3rd May 08, 08:49 AM
pedestrian's Avatar
pedestrian pedestrian is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: North-East
Age: 44
Posts: 3,024
118 Training Blog Entries
62.30 miles this week
642.13 miles this year
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuprasi
There is also a place for off topic chat and its not on a thread where someone has asked a question hence you have off topic chat on forums ...

Are you the type pf person down the pub that would randombly change the subject every 2 mins? :eek:

Simon, I'm sorry if you feel that your questions (or questions generally) aren't being answered. It's a curse that all forums live with: it's just the way they work.
The "Off Topic" section of the forum is a space where people start threads which otherwise would have no obvious home. The off topic content in other threads happens as a result of spontaneous banter.
In my last post I was just trying to explain that conversations do tend to change course spontaneously. Obviously, in a face-to-face situation it's always going to be more apparent as to when it will be appropriate to add something to a conversation which may divert its course. But as I said before, this is a very informal meeting place, and most people like to have a laugh and spend some time away from the more serious aspects of their lives.
I really don't think it's a case of members deliberately going onto a thread with the sole intention of sabotaging the subject just for the sake of it. Posts are merely written as spontaneous reactions to what is being read at any given time. There's no malice involved. Again, we're only talking about running: it's not a life or death thing. And most questions do get appropriate replies sooner or later, don't they?

Now I'm going to change the subject... :eek: How're the studies going, Simon? Is Carnegie still one of the top Sports Science facilities in the country? Have you any idea what you're going to do with your degree when you qualify? I have friends who studied there back in the 80's. I've raced on the track there a few times (is it the one with some halls of residence right next to it?).
__________________
ONLY THOSE WHO WILL RISK GOING TOO FAR CAN POSSIBLY FIND OUT HOW FAR THEY CAN GO.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 3rd May 08, 08:55 AM
dimple's Avatar
dimple dimple is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: up north
Age: 38
Posts: 1,851
43 Training Blog Entries
13.20 miles this week
239.50 miles this year
Quote:
Originally Posted by pedestrian
I really don't think it's a case of members deliberately going onto a thread with the sole intention of sabotaging the subject just for the sake of it. Posts are merely written as spontaneous reactions to what is being read at any given time. There's no malice involved. Again, we're only talking about running: it's not a life or death thing. And most questions do get appropriate replies sooner or later, don't they? .
I agree with you here, does it really matter it shouldn't be taken to seriously. Like you say the threads usually get brought back to square one eventually
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 3rd May 08, 07:56 PM
scr8pe's Avatar
scr8pe scr8pe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 710
125 Training Blog Entries
0.01 miles this week
532.43 miles this year
Quote:
Originally Posted by pedestrian
................ I really don't think it's a case of members deliberately going onto a thread with the sole intention of sabotaging the subject just for the sake of it...
Anyway, anyone have any objection to Blunder Boris becoming Mayor?
__________________
It's about getting out there and doing the distance, time doesn't matter apart from making it.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 3rd May 08, 08:11 PM
dimple's Avatar
dimple dimple is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: up north
Age: 38
Posts: 1,851
43 Training Blog Entries
13.20 miles this week
239.50 miles this year
Quote:
Originally Posted by scr8pe
Anyway, anyone have any objection to Blunder Boris becoming Mayor?
Who's blunder boris?
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 6th May 08, 12:13 PM
hot foot's Avatar
hot foot hot foot is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Age: 36
Posts: 668
118 Training Blog Entries
0.00 miles this week
16.01 miles this year
Quote:
Originally Posted by scr8pe
Anyway, anyone have any objection to Blunder Boris becoming Mayor?

NO.

It could've been worse.
__________________
FIRST THINGS FIRST
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 6th May 08, 12:54 PM
steepler's Avatar
steepler steepler is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sussex
Posts: 1,243
How????????????????????????????
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:38 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
runners forum