runners forum
Go Back
 
Reload this Page 10k run
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Other
Password
Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #21  
Old 5th May 08, 09:12 PM
AdamD AdamD is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 24
Looking back, I am disappointed not to run it sub 41 mins because I was a little rushed to get to the start and started much further back than I should have, thus spending the first 2k with slower people holding me up!!
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 5th May 08, 09:20 PM
AdamD AdamD is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 24
Hmm.. My official 'gun time' was 42.40 but my 'chip time' was 41.08. I was placed according to my gun time even though the chip records when one crosses the start and finish line. I am inclined to go with the chip time because surely that is the more accurate, considering I crossed the start line over a minute after the start of the race?
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 5th May 08, 09:44 PM
scr8pe's Avatar
scr8pe scr8pe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 710
125 Training Blog Entries
0.01 miles this week
532.43 miles this year
Yep, chip time every time!
__________________
It's about getting out there and doing the distance, time doesn't matter apart from making it.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 5th May 08, 09:59 PM
AdamD AdamD is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 24
Cool, more than happy with that for my first race!

Keen to do another now!
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 6th May 08, 06:47 AM
pedestrian's Avatar
pedestrian pedestrian is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: North-East
Age: 44
Posts: 3,012
117 Training Blog Entries
51.40 miles this week
631.23 miles this year
Yeah, and like you said Adam, you started further back which means that you actually had further to travel than those who started the race on the line.
__________________
ONLY THOSE WHO WILL RISK GOING TOO FAR CAN POSSIBLY FIND OUT HOW FAR THEY CAN GO.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 7th May 08, 01:41 PM
richardsimkiss's Avatar
richardsimkiss richardsimkiss is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Warwickshire
Age: 24
Posts: 2,841
Send a message via MSN to richardsimkiss
99 Training Blog Entries
5.51 miles this week
579.68 miles this year
indeed, chip time all the way for PB purposes

Fantastic run Adam, a bloody good time for a first race!!! You'll go far if you stick at it

I shall remain fairly smug at my finish time prediction
__________________
www.richardsimkiss.co.uk - Glooston 10k report added
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 7th May 08, 01:56 PM
LEECE's Avatar
LEECE LEECE is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Narfolk, Nr Great Yarmouth
Posts: 486
12 Training Blog Entries
0.00 miles this week
50.70 miles this year
Well done thats a good time, least you got there on time too

Ill shut up now........................... :blush:

Well done

__________________
Are We There Yet
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 7th May 08, 09:50 PM
AdamD AdamD is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by richardsimkiss
indeed, chip time all the way for PB purposes

Fantastic run Adam, a bloody good time for a first race!!! You'll go far if you stick at it

I shall remain fairly smug at my finish time prediction
Good prediction!

I don't want to get carried away though as the weather was pretty perfect; not cold, not warm and no wind/rain! If it was as warm as it has been for the past two days I'm not sure I would have managed that!

Also a little concerned that I have set myself up for a fall by setting a good time, maybe it would have been better to chip away at the time race by race. I'm not convinced that I can do sub 40 in less favourable conditions!!
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 8th May 08, 06:20 AM
pedestrian's Avatar
pedestrian pedestrian is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: North-East
Age: 44
Posts: 3,012
117 Training Blog Entries
51.40 miles this week
631.23 miles this year
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamD
Good prediction!

I don't want to get carried away though as the weather was pretty perfect; not cold, not warm and no wind/rain! If it was as warm as it has been for the past two days I'm not sure I would have managed that!

Also a little concerned that I have set myself up for a fall by setting a good time, maybe it would have been better to chip away at the time race by race. I'm not convinced that I can do sub 40 in less favourable conditions!!

I wouldn't worry about it Adam; I ran some of my fastest races in "less than favourable" conditions (thunder storms/heavy rain etc...).
__________________
ONLY THOSE WHO WILL RISK GOING TOO FAR CAN POSSIBLY FIND OUT HOW FAR THEY CAN GO.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 8th May 08, 04:16 PM
twinkle toes's Avatar
twinkle toes twinkle toes is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Age: 33
Posts: 3,207
138 Training Blog Entries
0.00 miles this week
104.33 miles this year
Well done Adam great result I am glad you did better than the 45 mins you wanted
__________________
In spite of the cost of living, it's still popular.

Bird in Boots
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:15 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
runners forum