Runners Forum
Home Info Search Members Contact Events Clubs
Register     Today's Posts     User Map     Socials     Training Blog
Go Back
 
Reload this Page Why 13.1 miles and not......
Password

Notices



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #16  
Old 3rd Jun 08, 07:08 PM
calton1954's Avatar
calton1954 calton1954 is offline
Age: 54   Gender: Male  
 
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 373
0.00 miles this week
125.10 miles this year
For goodness sakes folks, your on the internet, why speculate, a search reveals :

"The length of a marathon was not fixed at first, since the only important factor was that all athletes competed on the same course. The marathon races in the first few Olympic Games were not of a set length, but were approximately 40 km,[10] roughly the distance from Marathon to Athens by the longer, flatter route. The exact length of the Olympic marathon varied depending on the route established for each venue.

The marathon at the 1908 Summer Olympics in London was set to measure about 25 miles (40 km) and to start on ‘The Long Walk’ – a magnificent avenue leading up to Windsor Castle in the grounds of Windsor Great Park. The Princess of Wales wanted her children to watch the start of the race, so the start of the race was moved to the east lawn of Windsor Castle, increasing its length to 26 miles (42 km).[10] The race was to finish at the Great White City Stadium in Shepherd's Bush in London; however, Queen Alexandra insisted on having the best view of the finish; so, in the words of the official Olympic report, "385 yards were run on the cinder track to the finish, below the Royal Box".[10] The length then became 42.195 km (26 miles 385 yards or 26 7⁄32 miles).

For the next Olympics in 1912, the length was changed to 40.2 km (24.98 miles) and changed again to 42.75 km (26.56 miles) for the 1920 Olympics until it was fixed at the 1908 distance for the 1924 Olympics. In fact, of the first seven Olympic Games, there were six different marathon distances between 40 km and 42.75 km (40 km being used twice).

Following the 1908 Olympics in London, an annual event called the Polytechnic Marathon had been instituted over the 1908 distance of 26 miles 385 yards (42.195 km), and it was largely due to the prestige of the Polytechnic Marathon that 42.195 km was adopted as the official marathon distance in 1921 by the International Amateur Athletic Federation (IAAF) - Rule 240 of their Competition Rules.[1]. The difference between 42.195 km and 26 miles 385 yards is 1.2 centimetres. The difference between the standard distance and the rounded figure frequently employed (as in the table), 26.22 miles, is a little over two metres."
__________________
Don
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 3rd Jun 08, 08:39 PM
Grant's Avatar
Grant Grant is offline
Real Name: Doh!   Gender: Male  
 
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 1,043
0.00 miles this week
46.65 miles this year
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trinity
42.195 km seems a lot longer than 26.2 miles when you're running it...the k's seem to be neverending! so I'm happy to stay with miles thank you very much
You're right Trinity.

I've only done one marathon and it was marked in km's and you do start to feel as if you've been running forever when you see a marker ahead with a "35" or "40" on it.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 3rd Jun 08, 10:17 PM
BASE813 BASE813 is offline
Age: 34   Gender: Male  
 
Location: Oxfordshire
Posts: 246
Quote:
Originally Posted by calton1954
For goodness sakes folks, your on the internet, why speculate, a search reveals :
but we we not speculating about the reasons for the length of the marathon, but the reasons for the usage of miles and KMs for the different distances.... the setting of the marathon distance was already mentioned in earlier posts...
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 4th Jun 08, 12:06 AM
Aardvark's Avatar
Aardvark Aardvark is offline
Age: 22   Gender: Female  
 
Location: Michigan, United States
Send a message via AIM to Aardvark Send a message via Yahoo to Aardvark
When I first started running I was astounded to learn that the races were marked out in kilometers. Somebody told me that we were going to run a 5K and I said, what? And had to get out my hand calculator to convert into miles lol...But all the races I've run so far are in K's. I am seeing more eight mile races in my area though, but I'm curious if it's only because people around here don't really understand what a kilometer is 3.1 miles to me seems like less running than 5 kilometers lol
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 4th Jun 08, 09:14 AM
Owain's Avatar
Owain Owain is offline
Real Name: take a wild guess.......   Age: 27   Gender: Male  
 
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,932
0.00 miles this week
466.21 miles this year
ye I agree I would prefer to run in miles than K, miles = less distance

O.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

 
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
runners forum