Garmin,Garmin,Garmin,Garmin,Garmin,Garmin,Garmin,G armin,...

Garmin didn't even have a GPS product for runners when I bought my Timex SDM.

And it really is a nice watch even without the GPS add-on.

But the GPS arm unit does eat the AAA batteries.

And I wish there was a way to download the info to the PC (without buying and carrying the extra datalogger)

And the strap is almost impossibly difficult to put back on the watch - it really is a pain to fit.

Anyone else got something other than a Garmin? Anyone carry a generic GPS rather than a run-specific one?

Do we runners really need all this techno rubbish?
The answer is NO!
Just go and run as much as much as you can as often as you can.
Garmins DO NOT REPLACE TRAINING!!!!!

here here steepler. the obsession with logging data is just a ploy to give you a psychological lift it may be interesting to know but it doesn't actually make you faster.

has anyone done research into how much faster you would run without a garmin on your hand?

__________________
it's not how fast, it's how often

I think a GPS system is a useful tool. It helps prevent over/under training as you know exactly what distances you have done. It also allows you to regulate your pace over certain distances.

Of course some people become obsessive about the stats and maybe miss the bigger picture but I wouldn't dismiss it as being of no use.

I've never once heard anyone say "I don't need to train today cos I've got a garmin!".

I like my running, I like gadgets, I like looking at maps, I like looking at and analysing the information that the Garmin has logged about my running.

So do we runners NEED this techno rubbish? Obviously not.......

Do we runners WANT this techno rubbish? Some do, it's a matter of choice.

Will it make you run faster? Not any faster than your potential/training/effort allows. But it can provide information to enable you to make the most of what you do.

Interesting little debate...

When I first saw the Timex GPS, I wanted it so badly. It was a gadget I just had to have.

And I think it's served me well through my marathon training at the time - it definitely helped me know exactly how long each of my runs were - I generally wore it once to measure each of my local running loops and then after that didn't use it on them again. It also added a whole heap of excitement to a skiing holiday ;-)

However, I definitely don't run with it all the time... and I've never run with it in a race. Having said that I think I might actually be able to run races faster if I did wear it... I think I could use it to achieve much better pace consistency.

As for all the logging, I'm guilty as charged - I've kept a manual run diary for a few years - and in the last 10 months I've also been logging all my training on the excellent FetchEveryone site. Don't see any harm in this myself and I do feel it provides me with a good record to look back on - which hopefully I'll be able to use and benefit from in future run seasons.

rofl
non-Garmin GPS! :eek: Whatever will they think of next? Non-London marathons?

I have kept a training diary for 20 years.
Interesting to look back and see what worked and what didn't.
I found that 70-80 mpw with two track/hard sessions and a hilly run worked for me.
Ran all my pbs off that.

Steepler, I follow the same schedule as yourself, 60-70 miles/week two speed sessions, and a hill run. I work away from home during the week, and so train on my own most of the time. I find the Garmin great for interval training (I never train on the track), or for keeping track of the distances I'm covering in strange towns. For me the Garmin is a necessity.

I am also away from home alot too.
Interesting use for it,I had not thought off that one.I may just have to eat humble pie(yes I can!) and buy one!