 |
Hi there! Welcome to Runners Forum, a friendly online discussion board where you can join fellow runners in discussing all things related to running.
You are viewing the site as a guest, which means you either don't have a user account, or you haven't logged in. As a guest you are welcome to browse most parts of the site without restriction. If you wish to make your own posts you will need to sign up which is completely free.
|
 |
|

24th Nov 09, 02:29 PM
|
|
Real Name: Stu
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Location: Bristol
|
|
2009: 1671 miles
Week: 44.05 miles, 5 hrs 13 mins
Year: 1,778.34 miles, 216 hrs 7 mins
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JBBury
If he sticks with the programme and remains injury free, I think he is going (and aiming) for a lot faster than 2:45!!!!! My prediction would be 2:30-2:35
He wouldn't be doing all that additional mileage and quality sessions to run a marathon at 6:18 pace!
|
If he does succeed in such a ridiculous time then i insist he goes straight to the pub and gets the first round in, my Guiness would have just about settled by the time I arrive.
Or maybe he'll drag me round and i'll overtake him with a Km to go.
Sorry Rich, couldn't resist.
__________________
2011 Sturunner - <1:12:00 13.1 (Fulmar)
2010 Sturunner- sub 2:45 VLM (RichardSimkiss) DONE
*Gold medals aren't really made of gold. They're made of sweat, determination, and a hard-to-find alloy called guts.*
|

24th Nov 09, 03:40 PM
|
 |
Age: 26
Gender: Male
Location: Warwickshire
Administrator
|
|
2008: 1382 miles
2009: 2004 miles
Week: 34.34 miles, 3 hrs 52 mins
Year: 1,754.69 miles, 203 hrs 5 mins
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sturunner
I would upload my training plan but I'm a bit "special" when it comes to I.T., by all accounts I have an invalid file name or something.
|
If you want to email it to me I'm sure I can sort it (will PM you address).
Quote:
Originally Posted by carlwhitley
How are you going to remember what you're doing on runs that look like...
|
I can program it into the GPS, but it's pretty easy really, it goes 5,4,3,2,1, and for each number I do X miles @ tempo pace, X mins @ easy pace. The on the vast majority of my sessions I just have 2mi warmup, 2mi cool down.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neil Law
question the total rest the day before... has that worked for you in the past, it dosent make you "stiff"
|
I've always tried to have a rest day the day before a race - it's just something I've always done and never had reason to change it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JBBury
If he sticks with the programme and remains injury free, I think he is going (and aiming) for a lot faster than 2:45!!!!! My prediction would be 2:30-2:35 
|
I'll be aiming to beat 2:45 without doubt, but don't expect to be anywhere near your predictions JBB. Looking at how my half marathon time translated to marathon last year, my PB at Birmingham Half suggests I should be looking at 2:44. I would like to get this closer to 2:40, but will have to see how training goes. Last year I underestimated the difficulty of the marathon and have learnt not to set such optimistic goals!
Quote:
Originally Posted by sturunner
If he does succeed in such a ridiculous time then i insist he goes straight to the pub and gets the first round in, my Guiness would have just about settled by the time I arrive.
Or maybe he'll drag me round and i'll overtake him with a Km to go.
Sorry Rich, couldn't resist. 
|
I'll be more than happy to get you a nice cold pint of revenge.... I mean Guiness
__________________
www.richardsimkiss.co.uk
'The minimum requirement to achieve something is to believe that it's possible'
|

24th Nov 09, 03:49 PM
|
|
Real Name: Stu
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Location: Bristol
|
|
2009: 1671 miles
Week: 44.05 miles, 5 hrs 13 mins
Year: 1,778.34 miles, 216 hrs 7 mins
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by richardsimkiss
If you want to email it to me I'm sure I can sort it (will PM you address).
I'll be more than happy to get you a nice cold pint of revenge.... I mean Guiness 
|
Yeah send me your e-mail address and i'll get it across to you.
Revenge is a pint best served cold.
__________________
2011 Sturunner - <1:12:00 13.1 (Fulmar)
2010 Sturunner- sub 2:45 VLM (RichardSimkiss) DONE
*Gold medals aren't really made of gold. They're made of sweat, determination, and a hard-to-find alloy called guts.*
|

24th Nov 09, 03:58 PM
|
 |
Real Name: Grant
Gender: Male
Location: Hamilton
|
|
2008: 46 miles
Week: 0.00 miles, 0 hrs 0 mins
Year: 0.00 miles, 0 hrs 0 mins
|
|
|
Really interesting thread, enjoying reading all the comments and posts. Haven't had a chance to download the training plan as I'm on the Blackberry, but will look at it when I get home later.
__________________
Sub 1:50 half and sub-4 hour marathon (Thanks, Badz)
|

24th Nov 09, 04:34 PM
|
 |
Age: 26
Gender: Male
Location: Warwickshire
Administrator
|
|
2008: 1382 miles
2009: 2004 miles
Week: 34.34 miles, 3 hrs 52 mins
Year: 1,754.69 miles, 203 hrs 5 mins
|
|
|
Stu's Training Schedule:
__________________
www.richardsimkiss.co.uk
'The minimum requirement to achieve something is to believe that it's possible'
|

24th Nov 09, 05:20 PM
|
 |
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Location: Scotland but soon back to Portugal
|
|
2009: 2411 miles
Week: 0.00 miles, 0 hrs 0 mins
Year: 1,179.36 miles, 151 hrs 0 min
|
|
I will think of this as a pre-post as I have only glanced at both plans.
I will look into them and hopefully offer some decent opinion at some point.
Both seem to be able to produce good results - the expected results. I would go for Stu's plan as it seems to focus more on quality than on quantity and allows for good recovery periods but that's only because I am not sure at all that I could do with Richard's plan.
Richard's seems to be very ambicious and I think that if you (Richard) can survive it you will demolish the field and finish in a very good position/time.
My fear is about overtraining.
Is Stu doing too little? Is Rich doing too much?
I will look into the plans with time.
And I will follow this thread carefully.
Stuart, would you be so kind and start you own thread too?
|

24th Nov 09, 08:11 PM
|
 |
Age: 26
Gender: Male
Location: Warwickshire
Administrator
|
|
2008: 1382 miles
2009: 2004 miles
Week: 34.34 miles, 3 hrs 52 mins
Year: 1,754.69 miles, 203 hrs 5 mins
|
|
|
Having looked at Stu's plan I think it's a sensible and well balanced plan, and to be honest does make me question whether my own plan is too ambitious. Though that said - as you say fulmar, if I can avoid injury/overtraining, it should work out quite well.
It'll be interesting to see how you get on in this weekends half Stu. Am I right to assume the 20mi race will be done at, or faster than marathon pace?
__________________
www.richardsimkiss.co.uk
'The minimum requirement to achieve something is to believe that it's possible'
|

24th Nov 09, 08:22 PM
|
 |
Real Name: Chris
Gender: Male
Location: Warwickshire
|
|
|
|
Interesting stuff Rich/Stu.
Rich, I will be impressed if you can stick to those Wed afternoon workouts in Jan/Feb  . I've got the Daniels book as well and I can see the elite plan is very similar to yours in respect of the quality workouts. Good to see a rest and easy day following Wedgnock...I certainly needed it!!
By the way I spotted a small error on 7th March with the mileage 
Stu, some weeks appear heavy on "quality sessions" with hills, intervals and a long run. Have you considered a more progressive long run e.g. increasing pace every 5 miles in place of one of the other hard sessions? I'm not an expert but people have reported this giving good improvements in endurance. My Mike Gratton schedule has intervals OR hills in a particular week, but not both. Personally I would cut back on the amount of intervals for Mara....but that's mainly because I tend to injure myself more during those efforts!
One last point, are you really planning 10 miles followed by hills on Xmas day and boxing day? That is dedication!
As usual, if there was one "best" way of training, everybody would be doing it!
Good luck!
|

25th Nov 09, 07:59 AM
|
|
Real Name: Stu
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Location: Bristol
|
|
2009: 1671 miles
Week: 44.05 miles, 5 hrs 13 mins
Year: 1,778.34 miles, 216 hrs 7 mins
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by richardsimkiss
Having looked at Stu's plan I think it's a sensible and well balanced plan, and to be honest does make me question whether my own plan is too ambitious. Though that said - as you say fulmar, if I can avoid injury/overtraining, it should work out quite well.
It'll be interesting to see how you get on in this weekends half Stu. Am I right to assume the 20mi race will be done at, or faster than marathon pace?
|
the half this weekend is hilly, that said I still want to go sub 1.20, i did 1hr24mins26secs last year so if I can get a sub 1.20 then I'll be significantly ahead of last year.
the 20mile race has two killer hills but I want to go under marathon pace, ideally as close to 2hrs as possible.
__________________
2011 Sturunner - <1:12:00 13.1 (Fulmar)
2010 Sturunner- sub 2:45 VLM (RichardSimkiss) DONE
*Gold medals aren't really made of gold. They're made of sweat, determination, and a hard-to-find alloy called guts.*
Last edited by richardsimkiss; 25th Nov 09 at 09:04 AM..
Reason: Quote tags fixed :)
|

25th Nov 09, 08:08 AM
|
|
Real Name: Stu
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Location: Bristol
|
|
2009: 1671 miles
Week: 44.05 miles, 5 hrs 13 mins
Year: 1,778.34 miles, 216 hrs 7 mins
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisM
Interesting stuff Rich/Stu.
Stu, some weeks appear heavy on "quality sessions" with hills, intervals and a long run. Have you considered a more progressive long run e.g. increasing pace every 5 miles in place of one of the other hard sessions? I'm not an expert but people have reported this giving good improvements in endurance. My Mike Gratton schedule has intervals OR hills in a particular week, but not both. Personally I would cut back on the amount of intervals for Mara....but that's mainly because I tend to injure myself more during those efforts!
One last point, are you really planning 10 miles followed by hills on Xmas day and boxing day? That is dedication!
As usual, if there was one "best" way of training, everybody would be doing it!
Good luck!
|
Chris,
There maybe a few too many quality sessions in there, and no doubt the plan will change, but i find my body responds best to being pushed, intervals and hills sessions seem to have the most positive effect on my body. That said I'm training for a marathon and conequently have to "get the miles in". The problem i have with just running miles is that I become very stale and one paced and my technique suffers, I become a plodder.
I'm also a great believer in training your body to run faster than race pace, so come race day the pace seems easy(ish)
and yes i'll be doing a fair bit of running over christmas
Stu
__________________
2011 Sturunner - <1:12:00 13.1 (Fulmar)
2010 Sturunner- sub 2:45 VLM (RichardSimkiss) DONE
*Gold medals aren't really made of gold. They're made of sweat, determination, and a hard-to-find alloy called guts.*
|

25th Nov 09, 09:11 AM
|
 |
Age: 26
Gender: Male
Location: Warwickshire
Administrator
|
|
2008: 1382 miles
2009: 2004 miles
Week: 34.34 miles, 3 hrs 52 mins
Year: 1,754.69 miles, 203 hrs 5 mins
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisM
Rich, I will be impressed if you can stick to those Wed afternoon workouts in Jan/Feb  . I've got the Daniels book as well and I can see the elite plan is very similar to yours in respect of the quality workouts. Good to see a rest and easy day following Wedgnock...I certainly needed it!!
By the way I spotted a small error on 7th March with the mileage  
|
The wed afternoon workouts are probably going to be the hardest to motivate myself for - purely becuase they'll be done after a day in the office and ran in the dark. I'm considering doing them in Leamington on the way home from work so any shorter reps can be done at the track and tempo stuff can be done under streetlight, rather than complete darkness.
The last wedgnock completely wiped me out, and as much as I'd like to do a med-long run the following day, I just don't think it's possible!
I am somewhat nervous about the quality workouts suggested by Daniels, but purely because I've never done anything like it before and they're going to be tough sessions. Still he knows more than I do, so I trust his sessions, but will happily revise them if I'm struggling to cope.
Cheers for spotting the mileage error, it was originally a 22mi, but I wanted to fit in a 24mi LSR, so it's definately supposed to be 24mi (and the typo is now corrected)
__________________
www.richardsimkiss.co.uk
'The minimum requirement to achieve something is to believe that it's possible'
|

25th Nov 09, 12:36 PM
|
 |
Gender: Male
|
|
2008: 235 miles
Week: 0.00 miles, 0 hrs 0 mins
Year: 5.18 miles, 0 hrs 38 mins
|
|
|
If anybody wants my personal training plan then just divide Simkisses' figures by 10
__________________
I run because I don't have to.
|

26th Nov 09, 09:18 AM
|
 |
Age: 26
Gender: Male
Location: Warwickshire
Administrator
|
|
2008: 1382 miles
2009: 2004 miles
Week: 34.34 miles, 3 hrs 52 mins
Year: 1,754.69 miles, 203 hrs 5 mins
|
|
For anyone interested, I've updated the layout of the schedule a bit so it's a little easier to understand and digest - Sessions are more appropriately named:
Q1 Long is now either "Long Slow", "Long Mixed", or "Long Hard" and coloured accordingly
Q2 Tempo is now either labelled "Tempo" or "Intervals" and coloured accordingly
Information of what each quality ('Long', tempo & interval) session includes can be seen by hovering the mouse pointer over cells which have a little red mark in the top right hand corner.
It makes it a little easier to understand the structure of the schedule, though truth be told I just like spreadsheets
File can be found at:
http://www.runnersforum.co.uk/attach...simplified.zip
...also now in the original post
__________________
www.richardsimkiss.co.uk
'The minimum requirement to achieve something is to believe that it's possible'
|

27th Nov 09, 07:48 AM
|
|
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Location: London
|
|
|
|
|
Richard, it is interesting to see how you plan your runs, thanks for sharing. You are missing 3 long run sessions on Sundays for complete rest, why is this.
|

27th Nov 09, 10:25 AM
|
 |
Age: 26
Gender: Male
Location: Warwickshire
Administrator
|
|
2008: 1382 miles
2009: 2004 miles
Week: 34.34 miles, 3 hrs 52 mins
Year: 1,754.69 miles, 203 hrs 5 mins
|
|
|
Each one of those rest days is following a very hard race on the Saturday - incredibly hilly and hard work - I wouldn't be capable of performing a long run the day after those races without severely risking injury/overdoing it.... the course is approx 10k and is 7mins (20%!) slower than my 10k PB.
__________________
www.richardsimkiss.co.uk
'The minimum requirement to achieve something is to believe that it's possible'
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
 |