Runners Forum
Be A Big Fun Runner. Events Nationwide
Home Info Search Members Contact
Register     Show Posts Made Today     PBs     Top Miles     User Map    
Password

Hi there! Welcome to Runners Forum, a friendly online discussion board where you can join fellow runners in discussing all things related to running.

You are viewing the site as a guest, which means you either don't have a user account, or you haven't logged in. As a guest you are welcome to browse most parts of the site without restriction. If you wish to make your own posts you will need to sign up which is completely free.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #61  
Old 11th Feb 10, 08:54 AM
richardsimkiss's Avatar
richardsimkiss richardsimkiss is offline
Age: 26   Gender: Male  
Location: Warwickshire
Administrator
 
Send a message via MSN to richardsimkiss
2008: 1382 miles
2009: 2004 miles
Week: 43.95 miles, 5 hrs 8 mins
Year: 2,046.75 miles, 236 hrs 38 mins
Indeed... it was quite confidence boosting! Just need to work on maintaining it for longer now

I know you were only jestin, but I was genuinely suprised that the session suggested such long rests when I first saw it, and felt the need to find out why
__________________
www.richardsimkiss.co.uk
'The minimum requirement to achieve something is to believe that it's possible'
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 11th Feb 10, 09:17 AM
JBBury's Avatar
JBBury JBBury is offline
Real Name: James   Age: 36   Gender: Male  
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
 
2009: 106 miles
Week: 19.34 miles, 2 hrs 14 mins
Year: 1,452.12 miles, 174 hrs 18 mins
That's a really impressive session. Very good pacing, and as you say that's the main thing rather than the rest periods. And to be honest, your rest periods were still shorter than time spent at pace, which is what you're supposed to aim for.
__________________
Running Goals for 2010
1. Sub 5 minute mile(Done in 04:53)
2. Sub 17 5k (Done in 16:57)
4. Sub 1:20 half marathon
4. Sub 36 10k
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 11th Feb 10, 09:59 AM
Pindar Pindar is offline
Gender: Male  
Location: Edinburgh
 
2009: 74 miles
Week: 0.00 miles, 0 hrs 0 mins
Year: 0.00 miles, 0 hrs 0 mins
Have you ever tried spikes on the track Rich? The grip is a huge difference, especially when it's icy.
__________________
Sub 45 minute 10k challenge from Marcus, accepted Race day TBC
All pressure is self-inflicted. It's what you make of it or how you let it rub off on you. Sebastian Coe
http://paceendurance.blogspot.com/
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 11th Feb 10, 10:58 AM
richardsimkiss's Avatar
richardsimkiss richardsimkiss is offline
Age: 26   Gender: Male  
Location: Warwickshire
Administrator
 
Send a message via MSN to richardsimkiss
2008: 1382 miles
2009: 2004 miles
Week: 43.95 miles, 5 hrs 8 mins
Year: 2,046.75 miles, 236 hrs 38 mins
I've tried using my XC spikes (with shorter spikes obviously) on the track, and didn't like them at all - perhaps some middle distance spikes would be worth a try!
__________________
www.richardsimkiss.co.uk
'The minimum requirement to achieve something is to believe that it's possible'
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 11th Feb 10, 11:00 AM
sturunner sturunner is online now
Real Name: Stu   Age: 32   Gender: Male  
Location: Bristol
 
2009: 1671 miles
Week: 21.14 miles, 2 hrs 33 mins
Year: 2,139.17 miles, 258 hrs 22 mins
Rich,

I need advice, I've got a 10mile XC race on sunday, I'm trying to convince myself the race doesn't matter, the ultimate goal is VLM so my training should be focused on that, BUT I want to run as well as possible and am wondering what sort of rest you would suggest, shall I just train today and friday then have saturday off? Or should i have a little more rest?

Stu
__________________
VLM 2011 Grant - Sub 2hr28min
“there are those that break and bend, I’m the other kind”

*Gold medals aren't really made of gold. They're made of sweat, determination, and a hard-to-find alloy called guts.*
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 11th Feb 10, 11:15 AM
richardsimkiss's Avatar
richardsimkiss richardsimkiss is offline
Age: 26   Gender: Male  
Location: Warwickshire
Administrator
 
Send a message via MSN to richardsimkiss
2008: 1382 miles
2009: 2004 miles
Week: 43.95 miles, 5 hrs 8 mins
Year: 2,046.75 miles, 236 hrs 38 mins
Tough call isn't it! Of course VLM is priority, but then if you're racing, then you want to race to the best of your ability.

For what it's worth, this weekend I have a 10km XC on Saturday which I'll run hard, I plan to run 10k easy across the fields tomorrow and then a long SLOW run on Sunday (circa 16mi, but may extend it to 20mi if I feel up to it).

Next weekend I have a very tough 10km XC race on the Saturday, which I want to race as hard as possible, so mindful of VLM I'll be training as normal until the day before the race, which I'll take as a rest day, and I'll take the day following the race as a rest day too. Normally I'd ease off training in the week leading up to the race, but in this instance I plan to carry on training normally as much as possible - and I think this is a reasonable trade off.

I don't think there's a right/wrong answer though - If you decided to take a bit more rest, it wouldn't be a bad thing since training has been so intense lately.
__________________
www.richardsimkiss.co.uk
'The minimum requirement to achieve something is to believe that it's possible'

Last edited by richardsimkiss; 11th Feb 10 at 11:18 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 11th Feb 10, 12:18 PM
Revenged Revenged is offline
Gender: Male  
 
2008: 621 miles
Week: 0.00 miles, 0 hrs 0 mins
Year: 169.41 miles, 25 hrs 46 mins
Quote:
Originally Posted by richardsimkiss View Post
Bit soft wasn't it with 4mins rest between each one - though I'm assured the focus is on the fast paced running rather than worrying about length of recovery... I feel I could've managed on less recovery if I had to, but would've struggled a bit later in the session.
it is more normal to do the long reps at the start and at the end.

e.g. for your session (2 x 1 mile, 4x400m, 2 x 1 mile).

you see it is quite easy to do a few fast laps at the end and it isnt really as helpful.

having the fast laps in the middle and then pushing yourself at the end to ensure that your last to miles were the same speed as the first tends to be more effective so it's what we generally do on the track.

HTH
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 11th Feb 10, 12:24 PM
Revenged Revenged is offline
Gender: Male  
 
2008: 621 miles
Week: 0.00 miles, 0 hrs 0 mins
Year: 169.41 miles, 25 hrs 46 mins
the alternative is to do the 400m fast within the mile laps.

e.g. it's 4 x 1 mile with a flying last lap (e.g 3x400 at 10k pace, 1x400 at 3k pace) .

perhaps as you are training for a marathon you may do more repeats but it should work as well.
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 11th Feb 10, 12:50 PM
Fulmar's Avatar
Fulmar Fulmar is offline
Age: 32   Gender: Male  
Location: Portugal
 
2009: 2411 miles
Week: 25.48 miles, 3 hrs 21 mins
Year: 1,249.58 miles, 160 hrs 5 mins
Good session, Richard. Bit fast that first one but you held it together
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 11th Feb 10, 01:28 PM
richardsimkiss's Avatar
richardsimkiss richardsimkiss is offline
Age: 26   Gender: Male  
Location: Warwickshire
Administrator
 
Send a message via MSN to richardsimkiss
2008: 1382 miles
2009: 2004 miles
Week: 43.95 miles, 5 hrs 8 mins
Year: 2,046.75 miles, 236 hrs 38 mins
The session was devised by the american coach Jack Daniels (taken from his 'Elite' Marathon Training plan in his Running Formula book), I just followed the session as he intended.

To the best of my understanding the 400m reps aren't about pushing any of the energy systems, merely about moving quickly with good form to promote running efficiency (I suspect otherwise the rests wouldn't be quite so leniant). And that to do them earlier may cause premature fatigue and prevent the mile reps being completed at target pace (which is more important, as the pace is specifically targeting VO2MAX), if the 400m reps meant I was only able to complete the 1mi intervals at >=5:20/mi due to tired legs, the VO2MAX wouldn't be worked as hard, and therefore lose some of the training benefit. That's just me thinking out loud though.
__________________
www.richardsimkiss.co.uk
'The minimum requirement to achieve something is to believe that it's possible'
Reply With Quote
  #71  
Old 11th Feb 10, 05:52 PM
Fulmar's Avatar
Fulmar Fulmar is offline
Age: 32   Gender: Male  
Location: Portugal
 
2009: 2411 miles
Week: 25.48 miles, 3 hrs 21 mins
Year: 1,249.58 miles, 160 hrs 5 mins
That makes a lot of sense, Richard.
Work hard and get the good effect from the mile repeats. Then go faster and hold your form. Very well devised.
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 11th Feb 10, 07:59 PM
Revenged Revenged is offline
Gender: Male  
 
2008: 621 miles
Week: 0.00 miles, 0 hrs 0 mins
Year: 169.41 miles, 25 hrs 46 mins
Quote:
Originally Posted by richardsimkiss View Post
The session was devised by the american coach Jack Daniels (taken from his 'Elite' Marathon Training plan in his Running Formula book), I just followed the session as he intended.

To the best of my understanding the 400m reps aren't about pushing any of the energy systems, merely about moving quickly with good form to promote running efficiency (I suspect otherwise the rests wouldn't be quite so leniant). And that to do them earlier may cause premature fatigue and prevent the mile reps being completed at target pace (which is more important, as the pace is specifically targeting VO2MAX), if the 400m reps meant I was only able to complete the 1mi intervals at >=5:20/mi due to tired legs, the VO2MAX wouldn't be worked as hard, and therefore lose some of the training benefit. That's just me thinking out loud though.
fair point. it is easy to overcome that. you just need a long recovery between the first set of mile laps and the 400m reps. you also need another long recovery between the 400m reps and the second set of mile laps. it shouldnt make too much difference though, it is all variations of the same session.
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old 17th Feb 10, 08:03 PM
richardsimkiss's Avatar
richardsimkiss richardsimkiss is offline
Age: 26   Gender: Male  
Location: Warwickshire
Administrator
 
Send a message via MSN to richardsimkiss
2008: 1382 miles
2009: 2004 miles
Week: 43.95 miles, 5 hrs 8 mins
Year: 2,046.75 miles, 236 hrs 38 mins
Well.... I was going to post about what a great session I'd had this evening (14mi including 10mi at 5:59/mi, feeling relatively comfortable) But then I spy that Mr Leaney has completed a similar session, but with 3.1mi more fast paced running, and a few secs per mile faster too

Anyways, I'm happy with progress - big improvement from when I ran the same session 3 weeks ago (6secs/mi faster, lower heart rate, and it generally felt easier).
__________________
www.richardsimkiss.co.uk
'The minimum requirement to achieve something is to believe that it's possible'
Reply With Quote
  #74  
Old 17th Feb 10, 08:08 PM
Grant's Avatar
Grant Grant is offline
Real Name: Grant   Gender: Male  
Location: Hamilton
 
2008: 46 miles
Week: 0.00 miles, 0 hrs 0 mins
Year: 0.00 miles, 0 hrs 0 mins
Its good too hear that you had a good training session Rich! Its good to read about the progress you and Stu are making at the moment. Keep up the good work, gents!
__________________
Challenge - sub-57:00 Strathaven 10km, thanks to Suggsy
Reply With Quote
  #75  
Old 21st Feb 10, 06:59 PM
madmark's Avatar
madmark madmark is offline
Age: 48   Gender: Male  
Location: Peak District
 
Week: 19.55 miles, 2 hrs 53 mins
Year: 865.23 miles, 131 hrs 19 mins
awesome guys which I was in my 20s again and could be starting on this journey to the VLM a little younger than I am now. Some good running well done guys..............
__________________

The road to success is dotted with many tempting parking places.
www.justgiving.com/mark-street
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


 

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:45 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0