 |
Hi there! Welcome to Runners Forum, a friendly online discussion board where you can join fellow runners in discussing all things related to running.
You are viewing the site as a guest, which means you either don't have a user account, or you haven't logged in. As a guest you are welcome to browse most parts of the site without restriction. If you wish to make your own posts you will need to sign up which is completely free.
|
 |
|

11th Feb 10, 08:54 AM
|
 |
Age: 26
Gender: Male
Location: Warwickshire
Administrator
|
|
2008: 1382 miles
2009: 2004 miles
Week: 43.95 miles, 5 hrs 8 mins
Year: 2,046.75 miles, 236 hrs 38 mins
|
|
Indeed... it was quite confidence boosting! Just need to work on maintaining it for longer now
I know you were only jestin, but I was genuinely suprised that the session suggested such long rests when I first saw it, and felt the need to find out why
__________________
www.richardsimkiss.co.uk
'The minimum requirement to achieve something is to believe that it's possible'
|

11th Feb 10, 09:17 AM
|
 |
Real Name: James
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
|
|
2009: 106 miles
Week: 19.34 miles, 2 hrs 14 mins
Year: 1,452.12 miles, 174 hrs 18 mins
|
|
|
That's a really impressive session. Very good pacing, and as you say that's the main thing rather than the rest periods. And to be honest, your rest periods were still shorter than time spent at pace, which is what you're supposed to aim for.
__________________
Running Goals for 2010
1. Sub 5 minute mile(Done in 04:53)
2. Sub 17 5k (Done in 16:57)
4. Sub 1:20 half marathon
4. Sub 36 10k
|

11th Feb 10, 09:59 AM
|
|
Gender: Male
Location: Edinburgh
|
|
2009: 74 miles
Week: 0.00 miles, 0 hrs 0 mins
Year: 0.00 miles, 0 hrs 0 mins
|
|
|
Have you ever tried spikes on the track Rich? The grip is a huge difference, especially when it's icy.
__________________
Sub 45 minute 10k challenge from Marcus, accepted Race day TBC
All pressure is self-inflicted. It's what you make of it or how you let it rub off on you. Sebastian Coe
http://paceendurance.blogspot.com/
|

11th Feb 10, 10:58 AM
|
 |
Age: 26
Gender: Male
Location: Warwickshire
Administrator
|
|
2008: 1382 miles
2009: 2004 miles
Week: 43.95 miles, 5 hrs 8 mins
Year: 2,046.75 miles, 236 hrs 38 mins
|
|
|
I've tried using my XC spikes (with shorter spikes obviously) on the track, and didn't like them at all - perhaps some middle distance spikes would be worth a try!
__________________
www.richardsimkiss.co.uk
'The minimum requirement to achieve something is to believe that it's possible'
|

11th Feb 10, 11:00 AM
|
|
Real Name: Stu
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Location: Bristol
|
|
2009: 1671 miles
Week: 21.14 miles, 2 hrs 33 mins
Year: 2,139.17 miles, 258 hrs 22 mins
|
|
|
Rich,
I need advice, I've got a 10mile XC race on sunday, I'm trying to convince myself the race doesn't matter, the ultimate goal is VLM so my training should be focused on that, BUT I want to run as well as possible and am wondering what sort of rest you would suggest, shall I just train today and friday then have saturday off? Or should i have a little more rest?
Stu
__________________
VLM 2011 Grant - Sub 2hr28min
“there are those that break and bend, I’m the other kind”
*Gold medals aren't really made of gold. They're made of sweat, determination, and a hard-to-find alloy called guts.*
|

11th Feb 10, 11:15 AM
|
 |
Age: 26
Gender: Male
Location: Warwickshire
Administrator
|
|
2008: 1382 miles
2009: 2004 miles
Week: 43.95 miles, 5 hrs 8 mins
Year: 2,046.75 miles, 236 hrs 38 mins
|
|
|
Tough call isn't it! Of course VLM is priority, but then if you're racing, then you want to race to the best of your ability.
For what it's worth, this weekend I have a 10km XC on Saturday which I'll run hard, I plan to run 10k easy across the fields tomorrow and then a long SLOW run on Sunday (circa 16mi, but may extend it to 20mi if I feel up to it).
Next weekend I have a very tough 10km XC race on the Saturday, which I want to race as hard as possible, so mindful of VLM I'll be training as normal until the day before the race, which I'll take as a rest day, and I'll take the day following the race as a rest day too. Normally I'd ease off training in the week leading up to the race, but in this instance I plan to carry on training normally as much as possible - and I think this is a reasonable trade off.
I don't think there's a right/wrong answer though - If you decided to take a bit more rest, it wouldn't be a bad thing since training has been so intense lately.
__________________
www.richardsimkiss.co.uk
'The minimum requirement to achieve something is to believe that it's possible'
Last edited by richardsimkiss; 11th Feb 10 at 11:18 AM..
|

11th Feb 10, 12:18 PM
|
|
Gender: Male
|
|
2008: 621 miles
Week: 0.00 miles, 0 hrs 0 mins
Year: 169.41 miles, 25 hrs 46 mins
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by richardsimkiss
Bit soft wasn't it with 4mins rest between each one - though I'm assured the focus is on the fast paced running rather than worrying about length of recovery... I feel I could've managed on less recovery if I had to, but would've struggled a bit later in the session.
|
it is more normal to do the long reps at the start and at the end.
e.g. for your session (2 x 1 mile, 4x400m, 2 x 1 mile).
you see it is quite easy to do a few fast laps at the end and it isnt really as helpful.
having the fast laps in the middle and then pushing yourself at the end to ensure that your last to miles were the same speed as the first tends to be more effective so it's what we generally do on the track.
HTH
|

11th Feb 10, 12:24 PM
|
|
Gender: Male
|
|
2008: 621 miles
Week: 0.00 miles, 0 hrs 0 mins
Year: 169.41 miles, 25 hrs 46 mins
|
|
|
the alternative is to do the 400m fast within the mile laps.
e.g. it's 4 x 1 mile with a flying last lap (e.g 3x400 at 10k pace, 1x400 at 3k pace) .
perhaps as you are training for a marathon you may do more repeats but it should work as well.
|

11th Feb 10, 12:50 PM
|
 |
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Location: Portugal
|
|
2009: 2411 miles
Week: 25.48 miles, 3 hrs 21 mins
Year: 1,249.58 miles, 160 hrs 5 mins
|
|
Good session, Richard. Bit fast that first one but you held it together
|

11th Feb 10, 01:28 PM
|
 |
Age: 26
Gender: Male
Location: Warwickshire
Administrator
|
|
2008: 1382 miles
2009: 2004 miles
Week: 43.95 miles, 5 hrs 8 mins
Year: 2,046.75 miles, 236 hrs 38 mins
|
|
|
The session was devised by the american coach Jack Daniels (taken from his 'Elite' Marathon Training plan in his Running Formula book), I just followed the session as he intended.
To the best of my understanding the 400m reps aren't about pushing any of the energy systems, merely about moving quickly with good form to promote running efficiency (I suspect otherwise the rests wouldn't be quite so leniant). And that to do them earlier may cause premature fatigue and prevent the mile reps being completed at target pace (which is more important, as the pace is specifically targeting VO2MAX), if the 400m reps meant I was only able to complete the 1mi intervals at >=5:20/mi due to tired legs, the VO2MAX wouldn't be worked as hard, and therefore lose some of the training benefit. That's just me thinking out loud though.
__________________
www.richardsimkiss.co.uk
'The minimum requirement to achieve something is to believe that it's possible'
|

11th Feb 10, 05:52 PM
|
 |
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Location: Portugal
|
|
2009: 2411 miles
Week: 25.48 miles, 3 hrs 21 mins
Year: 1,249.58 miles, 160 hrs 5 mins
|
|
|
That makes a lot of sense, Richard.
Work hard and get the good effect from the mile repeats. Then go faster and hold your form. Very well devised.
|

11th Feb 10, 07:59 PM
|
|
Gender: Male
|
|
2008: 621 miles
Week: 0.00 miles, 0 hrs 0 mins
Year: 169.41 miles, 25 hrs 46 mins
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by richardsimkiss
The session was devised by the american coach Jack Daniels (taken from his 'Elite' Marathon Training plan in his Running Formula book), I just followed the session as he intended.
To the best of my understanding the 400m reps aren't about pushing any of the energy systems, merely about moving quickly with good form to promote running efficiency (I suspect otherwise the rests wouldn't be quite so leniant). And that to do them earlier may cause premature fatigue and prevent the mile reps being completed at target pace (which is more important, as the pace is specifically targeting VO2MAX), if the 400m reps meant I was only able to complete the 1mi intervals at >=5:20/mi due to tired legs, the VO2MAX wouldn't be worked as hard, and therefore lose some of the training benefit. That's just me thinking out loud though.
|
fair point. it is easy to overcome that. you just need a long recovery between the first set of mile laps and the 400m reps. you also need another long recovery between the 400m reps and the second set of mile laps. it shouldnt make too much difference though, it is all variations of the same session.
|

17th Feb 10, 08:03 PM
|
 |
Age: 26
Gender: Male
Location: Warwickshire
Administrator
|
|
2008: 1382 miles
2009: 2004 miles
Week: 43.95 miles, 5 hrs 8 mins
Year: 2,046.75 miles, 236 hrs 38 mins
|
|
Well.... I was going to post about what a great session I'd had this evening (14mi including 10mi at 5:59/mi, feeling relatively comfortable) But then I spy that Mr Leaney has completed a similar session, but with 3.1mi more fast paced running, and a few secs per mile faster too
Anyways, I'm happy with progress - big improvement from when I ran the same session 3 weeks ago (6secs/mi faster, lower heart rate, and it generally felt easier).
__________________
www.richardsimkiss.co.uk
'The minimum requirement to achieve something is to believe that it's possible'
|

17th Feb 10, 08:08 PM
|
 |
Real Name: Grant
Gender: Male
Location: Hamilton
|
|
2008: 46 miles
Week: 0.00 miles, 0 hrs 0 mins
Year: 0.00 miles, 0 hrs 0 mins
|
|
Its good too hear that you had a good training session Rich!  Its good to read about the progress you and Stu are making at the moment. Keep up the good work, gents!
__________________
Challenge - sub-57:00 Strathaven 10km, thanks to Suggsy
|

21st Feb 10, 06:59 PM
|
 |
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Location: Peak District
|
|
Week: 19.55 miles, 2 hrs 53 mins
Year: 865.23 miles, 131 hrs 19 mins
|
|
|
awesome guys which I was in my 20s again and could be starting on this journey to the VLM a little younger than I am now. Some good running well done guys..............
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
 |