I'm nearing the end of my weight loss but I'm very keen to maintain my level of fitness and continue with my new healthy diet in order to keep this new body I have

In the process of all this weight loss and new fitness regime I've become a little obsessed by statistics (PB's distance, heart rate etc.). I'm interested know opinions on resting heart rates, i.e. is it a case of the slower the better?

To a point, yes. You need to start worrying if it gets so slow that it's about to stop though


Generally, thinking of your heart as a muscle, the fitter it is the less hard it has to work to pump your blood round your body. By the same context the weaker it is the more times it has to pump to get your blood round.

Exercise makes your heart fitter, obviously, so it stands to reason as you run more your heart rate slows and you feel fitter.

However, if you're coming down with something or ill, then your heart rate natually increases, which is why many athletes check their resting heart rate before they get up in the morning and some take a rest day if it's 10 beats or more per minute above what it normally is.

Mine fluctuates because I'm asthmatic so I guage my fitness in other ways and I won't run with a cold, no matter what type of cold, or if I'm generally not feeling 'right' or too tired.

Thanks for that, what got me thinking about this was that I'd heard (on this forum I think) that Seb Coe had a resting heart rate of 27 bpm. When I checked mine it was 38bpm which worried me a little. Although I'm quite fit nowadays, I'm certianly not an athelete. Do you think I should worry about it?

38 sounds pretty low to me... so I don't think you have anything to worry about at all

As a gauge of fitness, it's not necessarily how low the pulse-rate is; but rather how quickly the rate falls back to normal (whatever that may be) after exercising.
Incidentally scr8pe, what method do you use for measuring your pulse-rate?... And when do you take the measurements?

__________________
GONE RUNNING

TBH I've only just started measuring my resting heart rate. I do that lieing in bed, hand on heart (honestly!) and watching the clock for a full minute before I drop off at night.

When training I measure via the hand grips on the treadmill, although probably not particularly accurate it gives a fair idea of what is happening. I set the pace at between 11 & 11.5 kph and generally run around 5k (depending on the time available). The treadmill measures my rate between 140 & 150 bpm but I occasionally set a slope to push the bpm up to around 163 before cutting the speed to recover the rate back down to 140.

I'm not concerned about my Heart rate while training, that seems quite normal, it's just the resting heart rate that I'm worried about because I don't consider myself to be anything near an elite athelete who would normally have such a low resting heart rate.

You mean you can actually use those hand grips on the treadmill?? Fair play! I think they're stupid, you're trying to run and measure your heart rate so you have to hold onto two fixed metal bars? Boooo!

HRM everytime for me! By contrast my resting HR is currently 42, i tend to measure either in the morning or at night (whenever I'm in bed and I remember really!)

Thanks for that, if yours is 42 I think I'll consider mine to be OK, ('twas 41 when I checked last night)

So far as those fixed bars go, I find them no different to pushing the younger two in the push chair up our hill when collecting the older one from school. Unfortunately, the younger ones are now walking everywhere and so we don't get the chance to power walk up the hill any more.

Last time I checked my resting heart rate it was 78.

I am just got back to the gym in the last few weeks after about 5 months of absence.

I am running 3 times a week (when possible)

Is this an ok resting heart rate for me?

__________________
Sing like you think no ones listening!!!
Dance like there's no-one around!!

Aren't HRM readings just "snapshots" of heart-rates?
If you take your reading from a HRM, is the figure you arrive at an average taken for the full minute? (I don't Know how the latest gadgets work, as I gave up using a HRM a few years ago when the novelty wore off and I'd figured that I had no real practical use for the information that they gave me... so maybe the figures that you're using are more accurate than I believe them to be? )
I still believe that the most accurate results are gained by using the "caveman" method of feeling a pulse-point and counting the beats for the full minute, thus allowing for any fluctuations which occur during that time.... If you rig up the HRM and it says, say, 40... that isn't necessarily what it's going to be for the full minute... Or is it ?
... I await the reprimands and corrections...

__________________
GONE RUNNING