Quote:
Originally Posted by TomStagg
Hi Revenged,
I've heard many people say that you should only do 1-2 speedwork session a week. But I haven't heard any good reasons why. I would have thought that if you want to train for a certain type of run, 5K for example, the training should be as close to what you will experience in the race.
I've heard the argument that you're likely to pick up injuries, (although I haven't yet - touch wood!), but are there any other reasons to limit speedwork? Also, what do regular runs actually achieve? I understand that Long runs will increase certain structures in the muscles and help improve running economy. But Regular runs just seem to be about higher mileage. Do they actually do anything useful? Maybe the answers in the 'lore of running' somewhere.....
|
variety is the spice of life... !
i think that running at different paces is more fun and is better in the long run...
e.g.
fartlek/intervals - faster than race pace
tempo - slightly slower than race pace
regular run - normal pace
long run - suistained slow pace
if you really want to concentrate on speedwork then this is fine...
i think fartlek and intervals (structured fartleks) are essentially the same thing so i don't see the point in doing both every week, which is why i suggested doing a regular run instead... i've just started doing intervals and i think these are the best and hardest runs by far so i'd ditch fartleks instead of intervals if i had a choice...
if you really want to concentrate on your pace worth going to an athletics tract and doing sprinting and intervals with other people... i have never been on an athletics tract before but it might be a good idea if you want to run faster... a bit of competition makes you run faster and i can never seem to get anywhere near my race pace on the short tempo runs running solo...
p.s. i don't read books or follow training scedules - this is just my views...