Runners Forum
Home Info Search Members Contact Events Clubs
Register     Show Posts Made Today     User Map     Socials    
Go Back
 
Reload this Page Was thinking of getting the garmin 305 for xmas, do you think its worth getting?
Password

Notices



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #31  
Old 8th Jan 08, 09:15 PM
Grant's Avatar
Grant Grant is offline
Real Name: Doh!   Gender: Male  
 
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 1,364
46 miles in 2008
0.00 miles this week
0.00 miles this year
Quote:
Originally Posted by richardsimkiss
as Dave says it can be as simple as that, or it can be even more in depth if you like. One feature I love (but haven't used yet) is to go for a run, then store it as a course on your Garmin and then race against yourself the following day (indicated by little stick man on the screen and a figure of how far ahead/behind you are)

Truely is awesome in my opinion
I've been using my forerunner regularly in the past two weeks.

I haven't used the Virtual Partner function, but have stored several of my regular routes in it's memory. I then compare all the data using the PC software and the Motion Based website.

I'm looking forward to running even more than usual, just so I can get home and upload the data to see if I'm getting faster.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 8th Jan 08, 10:36 PM
JBBury JBBury is offline
Age: 34   Gender: Male  
 
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Posts: 1,536
Do you find that the distance is accurate? Have you used it on a known distance and estimated any degrees of error. I'm really anal about accuracy, so if it is not at least 99.9999% accurate then I'm not sure I will bother. Gimme the stats :P
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 8th Jan 08, 10:42 PM
Katten's Avatar
Katten Katten is offline
Age: 28   Gender: Male  
 
Location: Sopot
Posts: 984
0.00 miles this week
0.00 miles this year
Don't know about the stats, but pretty darned accurate, as in, looking at where the GPS readings put me on Google Earth, I'm running reliably alongside a canal, on the correct side, and not down the middle of the canal I've run races where mine beeps mile splits reliably, exactly when crossing the mile markers

Better than any pedometer in my opinion
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 8th Jan 08, 11:25 PM
ed_m's Avatar
ed_m ed_m is offline
Gender: Male  
 
Posts: 412
it wont be 99.99999% ... maybe 98% ... 96 on a course with poor reception.
__________________
Now in bite size chunks...
www.ultrarunner.co.uk

ye olde run blog
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 9th Jan 08, 09:55 AM
richardsimkiss's Avatar
richardsimkiss richardsimkiss is offline
Age: 25   Gender: Male  
Co-admin
 
Location: Warwickshire
Posts: 5,057
Send a message via MSN to richardsimkiss
1382 miles in 2008
15.08 miles this week
22.84 miles this year
It's by far the most reliable method of measuring a course you'll get without retracing your steps exactly with a proper measuring device.

As katten says, the fantastic thing it that the garmin measures (and shows you on google maps etc) EXACTLY where you ran, where you cross roads, cut corners etc and is therefore more accurate than tracing your routes online yourself.

I believe there's also another piece of software that allows you to click and drag the route the Garmin measured if there's an error (such as if you run through a tunnel/subway and it loses GPS signal) therefore ensuring accurate measurement. Not a clue what it called though!

I'd also say that every single run I've uploaded to motionbased has shown "GPS signal: Excellent" including sections of runs through wooded areas and a 20-30m section under a low bridge.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 9th Jan 08, 09:38 PM
Grant's Avatar
Grant Grant is offline
Real Name: Doh!   Gender: Male  
 
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 1,364
46 miles in 2008
0.00 miles this week
0.00 miles this year
Quote:
Originally Posted by richardsimkiss
I'd also say that every single run I've uploaded to motionbased has shown "GPS signal: Excellent" including sections of runs through wooded areas and a 20-30m section under a low bridge.
Same here.


Quote:
Originally Posted by JBBury
Do you find that the distance is accurate? Have you used it on a known distance and estimated any degrees of error. I'm really anal about accuracy, so if it is not at least 99.9999% accurate then I'm not sure I will bother. Gimme the stats :P
Based on my usual training routes, I would say that the Garmin is pretty accurate.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 10th Jan 08, 11:11 AM
LEECE's Avatar
LEECE LEECE is offline
Real Name: Billy No Mates !!!!!!!   Age: 33   Gender: Female  
 
Location: Norfolk (just about)
Posts: 1,168
50 miles in 2008
0.00 miles this week
0.00 miles this year
I love mine and we did a time trial handicap tuesday and it was very very accurate.
__________________
Are we there Yet
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 10th Jan 08, 12:40 PM
ed_m's Avatar
ed_m ed_m is offline
Gender: Male  
 
Posts: 412
Quote:
Originally Posted by richardsimkiss
It's by far the most reliable method of measuring a course you'll get without retracing your steps exactly with a proper measuring device.
the footpod systems often return similarly accurate figures.
__________________
Now in bite size chunks...
www.ultrarunner.co.uk

ye olde run blog
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 10th Jan 08, 09:54 PM
Steady Edwina's Avatar
Steady Edwina Steady Edwina is offline
Gender: Female  
 
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 1,819
102 miles in 2008
11.00 miles this week
28.52 miles this year
My new Garmin 205 came yesterday but I picked it up today and took it out on a club run. I've had a 201 in the past and I can't get over the difference it picked up the satelites signals so quickly and didn't seem to drop out. I'll have to try some of the training tools I'm doing the Great North West run next month - eeek
__________________
Aint no stopping me now I'm in the groove
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 21st Jan 08, 02:42 PM
EmmaC EmmaC is offline
 
Posts: 45
242 miles in 2008
0.00 miles this week
0.00 miles this year
Leece - how big is the 305 on a small female wrist, I am currently thinking about it but they look so big!
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 21st Jan 08, 02:58 PM
richardsimkiss's Avatar
richardsimkiss richardsimkiss is offline
Age: 25   Gender: Male  
Co-admin
 
Location: Warwickshire
Posts: 5,057
Send a message via MSN to richardsimkiss
1382 miles in 2008
15.08 miles this week
22.84 miles this year
It's a fairly big unit regardless of what size wrist it's on, though I'd have thought as a runner you'd have given up worrying about how you look whilst running by now
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 21st Jan 08, 05:23 PM
EmmaC EmmaC is offline
 
Posts: 45
242 miles in 2008
0.00 miles this week
0.00 miles this year
bugger - you've seen me!!!

My concern was that the strap would be to big, i am built like an anorexic twiglet
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Need Help with Garmin 301 and Sportracks technium Watches & GPS 6 19th Apr 08 01:04 PM
Pls help with Garmin 301 technium Watches & GPS 15 23rd Sep 07 03:41 PM

 
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:41 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
runners forum