Runners Forum banner
1 - 15 of 15 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
20,661 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Would it be easier if all races were measured in miles or kilometres only ?

With thanks to Bagpuss...
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
231 Posts
Me, I prefer km's. I grew up with them, and have a very good feeling for how far a km is. Not so with miles. Plus miles are so much further (1.6km), so it always sounds as though you've achieved so much more when you can say you've run 'five' km rather than just a measly 'three' miles.

Give me km any day.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
20,661 Posts
Discussion Starter · #7 ·
I'm with Dan.....not literally you'll understand!
No idea what my mins/km are but know what I do per mile on an average run so can guestimate the distance run fairly accurately.

What's a track?! Aren't they for athletes rather than runners?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
813 Posts
I seem to be constantly converting from one to the other. Although I do lots of 5 mile runs, but never think of them as 8046.720 KMs. Seems all my training is in miles, all races in KMs.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
20,661 Posts
Discussion Starter · #9 ·
Blimey, no wonder 5 mile runs take so long if you run them as kms...I mean 8046 kms =5m!
Been a long day has it Bagpuss?!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
813 Posts
Steve said:
Blimey, no wonder 5 mile runs take so long if you run them as kms...I mean 8046 kms =5m!
Been a long day has it Bagpuss?!
ooooppppppssssss...Think I put the point in the wrong place. Looks even worse when I leave the 'converter' in the wrong measure like nautical miles or leagues!

Maybe I'm just fitter than I thought and will have to adjust my training notes, maybe my running shoes have been a lot further than I thought with my arithmatic!
 
1 - 15 of 15 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top